7/24/2023 0 Comments Essay paper writerAnd I think doing an assignment like this, or even hearing about it secondhand from someone else can help people kind of realize the cracks that are in the use of chat boxes like this, and ways we shouldn’t be using them and should be. Stylianopoulos: My friends have all been fascinated by this assignment, and surprised to learn the results of it. McCarty Carino: Fayrah what have you told other folks about your experience? So yeah, it’s been very interesting to have conversations with others about it. But I’ve certainly talked about it to them and said, like I was shocked with how terrible this essay was, I talked about it with like my writing center friends. I don’t think most of my close friends would use it on assignments. McCarty Carino: Have either of you talked about your experience with this assignment and with ChatGPT, you know, with your peers who might be using it in inadvisable ways?īaker: I certainly have. So that was like, sort of realistic, but definitely not a real source. And the other I think, was a completely made up article, but at least this seemed like a perspective that that author might have taken. It was an article, a chapter that this author had not written, but was a real title just attributed to someone else. It was very interesting to see which sources and like what kinds of sources that use. I was like this, just overall, this sucks. And I left so many like comments as if I were the professor. McCarty Carino: And Cal, what was your experience? What happened with your prompt?Ĭal Baker: It was a horrible essay. And I don’t really want to live in a world where looking for the right answer is rewarded over critical thinking, over actually forming opinions that are genuine. So it was almost like it was trying to think, ‘what is the right answer,’ instead of, you know, a human would like actually form an opinion, you know, even if the opinion had some levels of nuance or complexity to it. It was using the same language from the prompt over and over again, it was hallucinating sources that looked like they could be plausible, but then you found out that they weren’t. And the chatbot kind of seemed like it was looking for what the right answer was, and just spitting it out. Both students said they found the assignment eye-opening.įayrah Stylianopoulos: I could tell that a human would look at the prompt, see the nuances in it, and use their own experiences to like, you know, come to not an answer, but like a line of reasoning. ![]() I gave him a D,” said Fayrah Stylianopoulos, another rising sophomore at Elon University. ![]() “I failed the assignment,” said Cal Baker, a rising sophomore at Elon University. I mean, maybe I should have expected it because they were all using the same prompt, but I didn’t.Īnd his students, it turned out, were pretty tough graders. ![]() And then I had a series of questions about did this fabricate any sources? If it did, how did you find them? Did it use any sources that were real, but incorrectly, to try to understand the way that this thing works? I figured that there would be a likelihood that most of the essays would at least have some problem, but I didn’t think all 63 would have confabulated info, that surprised me, too. And so they would have to leave five comments or more on the Word doc. ![]() Chris Howell: The idea was the regenerating essay based on the prompt, they would grade the essay kind of like they were the professor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |